”And that no man my buie or sel, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” - 1582 Douai-Rheims Apocalypse 13:17

”The heretical Second Vatican Council in an act of consummate blasphemy, mandated "changes" in the Holy Sacraments (sacred depositum of faith) instituted by The Second Person of the Trinity and His Divine Church. The (phony) Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano reported that "the Second Vatican Council introduced certain modifications in the very essence of the sacramental rites." - The Constitution on the Liturgy of Vatican II ordered that the rite for the baptism of infants and adults be revised. The new rite for the baptism of infants was introduced on June 1, 1970. The RCIA (Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults) was issued on January 6, 1972.” - Today's Catholic World

”The ancients said that the child was punished for the sins of its father. We say that this its deformity or disease is the consequence of its father's vices; but so far as concerns the question of justice or injustice, that is merely the change of a word.” - Morals & Dogma, p.830

Anna-Katrina Emmerick (1774-1824 A.D.)

"Then, I saw that everything that pertained to Protestantism was gradually gaining the upper hand, and the Catholic religion fell into complete decadence. Most priests were lured by the glittering but false knowledge of young school-teachers [Modernists], and they all contributed to the work of destruction.- Prophetic Vision of Venerable Anna-Katrina Emmerick (1774-1824 A.D.) Augustinian Nun, Stigmatist.

In the chaos of WWII, Freemason Pius XII opened the Seal of Baptism by removing of the name of God (the Holy Ghost) and replacing it with the “Holy Spirit.” The consequence of this reality of the 20th Century breakdown of the Church from within is that the Judeo-Masonic controlled Vatican has been withholding the Sacrament of Baptism from infants since 1944. The loss of the Third Name of the Trinty, (Third Reich) as the occult refers to it is the spiritual tactic used by Freemasonry to condemn the 1 billion strong army of Catholics. Freemasons would never tolerate any change in their initation rite, but Catholics did, and they are suffering for it.

St. Lucia of Fatima

“It is with a certain trepidation because if you despise and reject this ultimate means, we will not have any more forgiveness from Heaven, because we will have committed a sin which the Gospel calls the sin against the Holy Ghost. This sin consists of openly rejecting, with full knowledge and consent, the salvation which He offers.”

- Sister Lúcia Santos, 1957

“But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, shall never have forgiveness, but shall be guilty of an everlasting sin.”

- Mark 3:29 1899 D.R.

This is why we believe the Mother of God appeared to Sister Lúcia of Fátima and urged her to write down the contents of the Third Secret in that same year, 1944. Our Lady was offering the Rosary as the only remedy to Catholics who did not realize this was happening. For those who did not preserve the Catholic Rite, the Rosary is their only option before Judgment Day. If you find it odd that the Catholic Hierarchy of Bishops and Cardinals are altering the Mass to deceive Catholics into welcoming in the Jewish Messiah, your suspicions are well founded. If you believe the Mother of God appeared and showed Hell to three small children because the situation wasn't serious, think again.

Catholic priests who blindly follow the NEW “REVISED” RITE issued by their Masonic Bishops are not going to enjoy the punishments in Hell. Their reality is that by not taking their jobs seriously and by playing follow the leader or whatever they are doing now in “seminaries” will be an eternity in Hell. As for the parishioners who trusted their souls to them, their anger about their condemnations is only going to add to their pastors' torments in the fire.

”I will strike the shephard and the sheep will be scattered.” - The Masonic Jesus from Mark 14:27

”To effect a confusion of ideas is an old scheme of the Devil. Not to understand clearly and precisely is generally the source of intellectual error. In time of schism and heresy, to cloud and distort the proper sense of words is a fruitful artifice of Satan, and it is as easy to lay snares for the intellectually proud as for the innocent. Every heresy in the Church bears testimony to Satan's success in deceiving the human intellect by obscuring and perverting the meaning of words.” - (Liberalism Is A Sin, [Chp XII], by Fr. Felix Sarda Y Salvany 1899 A.D.)


1957 print of Denzinger's “The Sources of Catholic Dogma” which indicates if a child is baptized with the heretical “holy spirit”, the child remains unbaptized

Alexander III, 1159-1181

Certainly if anyone immerses a child in water three times in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen, and he does not say: “I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, Amen,” the child is not baptized. Let those concerning whom there is a doubt, whether or not they have been baptized, be baptized after these words have first been uttered: “If you are baptized I do not baptize you, if you are not yet baptized, I baptize you, etc.”

Luke 12:10: .”..but to him that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven.”

Romans 2:24: ”For the name of God through you is blasphemed among the Gentiles, as it is written.”

The situation today is quite dire. Freemasons have destroyed the Church of Christ from within by marking most Catholics with the spritual mark and imposing the character of the devil. If you thought something didn't seem right about modern Catholicism, your suspicions are correct. If you're wondering how they did it, this is how. If you don't want to go down with the Vatican II mothership, you will find in the Dogma directions for correcting this. A priest is not needed, anyone can baptize in the case of emergency. Scroll down for directions.

This is the real reason why society is literally “going to hell” because when the name of the God is changed to the Devil in this critical Rite, the spiritual protections from the Holy Ghost are not imprined to the soul. More specifically, it leaves that marked individual without the power to withstand the devil, possession, curses, scripture- it simply makes that soul another “brick in the wall.”

"The confusion will be so general that men will not be able to think aright, as if God had withheld His Providence from mankind, and that, during the worst crisis, the best that can be done would be to remain where God has placed us, and persevere in fervent prayers... At that time there will be such a terrible crisis that people will believe that the end of the world has come. Blood will flow in many large cities. The very elements will be convulsed. It will be like a little General Judgement." (Prophecy of Fr. Nectou, S.J., 18th Century)

The purpse or in layman's terms, of an exorcism is to correct this baptismal absence by first, getting rid of the demons and second, performing the corrective Rite of Baptism CORRECTLY, so this can never happen to that soul again. The Holy Ghost from then on gives the soul an impenetrable armour that prevents possession from reoccuring. Intelligence to interpret scripture, grace and other gifts that the person can actually feel are some of the other effects. The early Christians knew and protected these things which is why they were proud to die in defense of their faith. When this effect occurred, God became a reality (and the importance of preserving the Rites of the Catholic Church), not just some “superstitious” or probable theory based on reason. But you really don't see this effect in people anymore and this is why. The powers of the original Church and its Rites are fully available to anyone that wants them. Nothing has changed- it's just that man was distracted into forgetting how to do it.

It is difficult to describe the feeling of the power of the Holy Ghost when Christ's Rite of Baptism is validly administered, but it is real. As the Council of Trent correctly demands, anyone that denies this real effect is anathema. But most “priests” don't study Dogma, read the laws of the Councils, study Fátima or even crack open Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica. They are stuck on one book, the bible, which was purposely written by Gnostic Freemasons to destroy the Metaphysical effects of this critical Sacrament. One method frequently used by Church Doctors to explain the 'effect' of receiving the Holy Ghost was: substance, an area which those who study Metaphysics attempt to explain. We must warn you though, most who study Metaphysics, Alchemy, Witchcraft, etc., do so in an effort to eliminate the Sacramental effect of the Holy Ghost in their Masonic Lodge teachings. Their goal is to prevent people from receiving this critically important Sacramental effect so that they essentially become spiritually-retarded slaves for their matrix, who in their fantasy of falling to the Masonic State religion, become slaves of Lucifer and eventually get dragged down into Hell, where Masonry rules.

The “Pope” of Freemasonry, Albert Pike, explains this on page 734 of Morals and Dogma (quote below). He also highlights Acts of the Apostles XVIII and XIX in this long book.- in fact, apart from the Apocalypse, these are the only two Biblical references made by this Luciferian Grand Master in the entire book and it should not be unnoticed that he concentrates on Acts XIX, the basis of Exorcism in the Latin Vulgate. Church Doctor St. Thomas Aquinas also explains this in Summa Theologica (scan provided below).

Morals & Dogma Cover

Worldwide Head of Luciferian Freemaonry, Albert Pike (1916):

”This agent, partially revealed by the blind guesses of the disciples of Mesmer, is preceisely what the Adepts of the middle ages called the elementary matter of the great work. The Gnostics held that it composed the igneous body of the Holy Spirit; and it was adored in the secret rites of the Sabbat or the Temple, under the hieroglyphic figure of Baphomet or the hermaphroditic goat of Mendes.”

Freemasonic Manual: Morals and Dogma page 734

Freemason Albert Pike, leader of the organization in the 1800's

“This agent, which barely manifests under the uncertain methods of Mesmer's followers, is precisely that which the adepts of the Middle Ages denominated the First Matter of the Great Work. The Gnostics represented it as the fiery body of the Holy Spirit; it was the object of adoration in the Secret Rites of the Sabbath and the Temple, under the hieroglyphic figure of Baphomet or the Androgyne of Mendes. All this will be proved. Here then are the secrets of occult philosophy, and such is Magic in history. Let us glance at it now as it appears in its books and its acts, in its Initiations and its Rites.” - The Doctrine of Transcendental Magic, PART I: page 8

”In the soul of the world, which is the Universal Agent, there is a current of love and a current of wrath. This ambient and all-penetrating fluid; this ray loosened from the sun's splendour and fixed by the weight of the atmosphere and the power of central attraction; this body of the Holy Spirit, which we term the Universal Agent, while it was typified by the ancients under the symbol of a serpent devouring its tail; this electromagnetic ether, this vital and luminous caloric, is depicted in archaic monuments by the girdle of Isis, twice-folded in a love-knot round two poles, as well as by the serpent devouring its own tail, emblematic of prudence and of Saturn.” - The Doctrine of Transcendental Magic, PART I: page 11

”The present Angels were human in the Moon Period, and the highest Initiate is The Holy Spirit, (Jehovah.)” - Freemasonry and Catholicism by Max Heindel, page 9.

Thomas Aquinas


Summa Theologica, 1947 Benziger Brothers, Volume I, Question 13, Fourth Article:

Argument: If all names applied to God are synonymous, we cannot properly say good God, or the like, and yet it is written, O most mighty, great and powerful, the Lord of hosts is Thy name (Jer. xxxii. 18).

I argue that, These names spoken of God are not synonymous…these names signify the divine substance, although in an imperfect manner, it is also clear from what has been said that they have diverse meanings…Therefore, although the names applied to God signify one thing, still because they signify that under many and different aspects, they are not synonymous.

St. Thomas Aquinas (1262): “Wisdom may fill the hearts of the faithful, and put to silence the dread folly of heretics, fittingly referred to as the gates of Hell.” (Intro. To Catena Aurea.)

1947 copy of Summa Theologica

13th Century Doctor of the Catholic Church St. Thomas Aquinas explains his understanding of the difference between Christ's Sacrament of baptism and John's baptism which is as effective to your salvation as taking a bath: nothing. You are just as “saved” as if you used the name Mickey Mouse. This is the deception that is the “Mark of the Beast” in the Apocalypse, a spiritual mark on the forehead caused by the counter-church in the Apocalypse, an absent Sacrament which by its very nature, causes that soul to be anathematized from Heaven. Click on the image on the left to open up a new browser window with this 1947 translation of St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica. It is about 14 pages of scans. This is to save bandwith on our end.

Summa Theologica, 1947 Benziger Brothers, Volume II, Question 38, Sixth Article:

Argument: Whether Those Who Had Been Baptized with John's Baptism Had to be Baptized with the Baptism of Christ?

Augustine says (Super Joan., Tract v): Those who were baptized with John's baptism (Holy Spirit) needed to be baptized with the baptism of our Lord (Holy Ghost)...John's baptism neither conferred grace nor imprinted a character, but was merely in water, as he says himself (Matth. iii. 11). Wherefore the faith or hope which the person baptized had in Christ could not supply this defect.

Do not accept a Vatican II Satanic Sacrament. When in doubt, do it yourself.

Summa Theologica: Sacramental Mark

Doctors of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas explains the effects of the Seven Seals, Grace & Character: an indellible mark imprinted on the soul, & THE MARK OF THE BEAST. Click on the image to the left to read from Summa Theologica, 1947.

Summa Theologica, 1947 Benziger Brothers, Volume II, Question 63, Fourth Article:

Argument: Whether The Sacramental Character is the Character of Christ?

Obj 3. Further, a man is marked with a character that he may be distinguishable from others. But the saints are distinguishable from others by charity, which, as Augustine says (De Trin. xv), alone separates the children of the Kingdom from the children of perdition: wherefore also the children of perdition are said to have the character of the beast (Apoc. xiii. 16, 17).

Reply Obj. 3. A character distinguishes one from another, in relation to some particular end, to which he, who receives the character, is ordained: as has been stated concerning the military character (A.1) by which a soldier of the king is distinguished from the enemy's soldier in relation to the battle. In like manner the character of the faithful is that by which the faithful of Christ are distinguished from the servants of the devil, either in relation to eternal life, or in relation to the worship of the Church that now is. Of these the former is the result of charity and grace, as the objection runs; while the latter results from the sacramental character. Wherefore the character of the beast may be understood by opposition, to mean either the obstinate malice for which some are assigned to eternal punishment, or the profession of an unlawful form of worship.


In the video to the left, a Protestant Lord-worshipping heretic makes it perfectly obvious what he is doing to his flock: sending them to the fire. On the right is a relevant scene from “The Godfather” from 1972, directed by Freemason Francis Ford Coppola. This scene is called “Baptism by Fire.” Pacino's character is distracted from his duty to make sure the Sacrament is being administered correctly, but he has other things on his mind. The priest does not use the correct Latin Rite in the name of Spiritum Sanctum and therefore does not baptize the child. The grace of Christ ends in that family and it eventually falls apart.